MBE Advance Access published online on July 21, 2004
Molecular Biology and Evolution, doi:10.1093/molbev/msh217
Molecular Biology and Evolution © Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004; all rights reserved
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: syokoya{at}emory.edu.
The wavelengths of maximal absorption (
Original Articles
The Molecular Basis of Adaptive Evolution of Squirrelfish Rhodopsins
![]()
Abstract
max) of the rhodopsins of nine squirrelfishes (N. sammara, N. argenteus, S. punctatissimum, S. microstoma, S. diadema, S. xantherythrum, S. spiniferum, N. aurolineatus, and S. tiere) and two soldierfishes (M. violacea and M. berndti) vary between 481 and 502 nm (Munz and McFarland 1973; Toller 1996). Phylogenetic and mutagenesis analyses suggest that the common ancestor of these pigments had a
max value of
493 nm and the contemporary
max values were generated mostly by amino acid replacements E122M, F261Y, and A292S. The probability of observing all these amino acid replacements at specific branches of the phylogenetic tree is only 2.5 x 10-9; it is highly unlikely that these changes have occurred by neutral evolution. Because of a close association between the
max values of these pigments and the wavelengths of light available to the corresponding species, the excess number of amino acid changes at specific branches in the phylogenetic tree strongly suggests that the rhodopsins have undergone adaptive changes at various stages of the holocentrid evolution.![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?