Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (306)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuhner, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Felsenstein, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuhner, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Felsenstein, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol 11, 459-468, Copyright © 1994 by Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates [published erratum appears in Mol Biol Evol 1995 May;12(3):525]

MK Kuhner and J Felsenstein
Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

Using simulated data, we compared five methods of phylogenetic tree estimation: parsimony, compatibility, maximum likelihood, Fitch- Margoliash, and neighbor joining. For each combination of substitution rates and sequence length, 100 data sets were generated for each of 50 trees, for a total of 5,000 replications per condition. Accuracy was measured by two measures of the distance between the true tree and the estimate of the tree, one measure sensitive to accuracy of branch lengths and the other not. The distance-matrix methods (Fitch- Margoliash and neighbor joining) performed best when they were constrained from estimating negative branch lengths; all comparisons with other methods used this constraint. Parsimony and compatibility had similar results, with compatibility generally inferior; Fitch- Margoliash and neighbor joining had similar results, with neighbor joining generally slightly inferior. Maximum likelihood was the most successful method overall, although for short sequences Fitch- Margoliash and neighbor joining were sometimes better. Bias of the estimates was inferred by measuring whether the independent estimates of a tree for different data sets were closer to the true tree than to each other. Parsimony and compatibility had particular difficulty with inaccuracy and bias when substitution rates varied among different branches. When rates of evolution varied among different sites, all methods showed signs of inaccuracy and bias.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Dereeper, V. Guignon, G. Blanc, S. Audic, S. Buffet, F. Chevenet, J.-F. Dufayard, S. Guindon, V. Lefort, M. Lescot, et al.
Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2008; 36(suppl_2): W465 - W469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Shi and P. G. Falkowski
Genome evolution in cyanobacteria: The stable core and the variable shell
PNAS, February 19, 2008; 105(7): 2510 - 2515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
M. D. Rasmussen and M. Kellis
Accurate gene-tree reconstruction by learning gene- and species-specific substitution rates across multiple complete genomes
Genome Res., December 1, 2007; 17(12): 1932 - 1942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
V. Soria-Carrasco, G. Talavera, J. Igea, and J. Castresana
The K tree score: quantification of differences in the relative branch length and topology of phylogenetic trees
Bioinformatics, November 1, 2007; 23(21): 2954 - 2956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
P. J. Waddell, H. Kishino, and R. Ota
Phylogenetic Methodology for Detecting Protein Interactions
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2007; 24(3): 650 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
M. Ninio, E. Privman, T. Pupko, and N. Friedman
Phylogeny reconstruction: increasing the accuracy of pairwise distance estimation using Bayesian inference of evolutionary rates
Bioinformatics, January 15, 2007; 23(2): e136 - e141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
O. Gascuel and M. Steel
Neighbor-Joining Revealed
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 1997 - 2000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
B. L. Cantarel, H. G. Morrison, and W. Pearson
Exploring the Relationship between Sequence Similarity and Accurate Phylogenetic Trees
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2006; 23(11): 2090 - 2100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Guindon, M. Black, and A. Rodrigo
Control of the False Discovery Rate Applied to the Detection of Positively Selected Amino Acid Sites
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2006; 23(5): 919 - 926.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PaleobiologyHome page
K. D. Angielczyk and D. L. Fox
Exploring new uses for measures of fit of phylogenetic hypotheses to the fossil record
Paleobiology, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 147 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
W. Hordijk and O. Gascuel
Improving the efficiency of SPR moves in phylogenetic tree search methods based on maximum likelihood
Bioinformatics, December 15, 2005; 21(24): 4338 - 4347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
D. R. Livesay and D. La
The evolutionary origins and catalytic importance of conserved electrostatic networks within TIM-barrel proteins
Protein Sci., May 1, 2005; 14(5): 1158 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
T. M. Keane, T. J. Naughton, S. A. A. Travers, J. O. McInerney, and G. P. McCormack
DPRml: distributed phylogeny reconstruction by maximum likelihood
Bioinformatics, April 1, 2005; 21(7): 969 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
B. G. Hall
Comparison of the Accuracies of Several Phylogenetic Methods Using Protein and DNA Sequences
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 792 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Z. Abdo, V. N. Minin, P. Joyce, and J. Sullivan
Accounting for Uncertainty in the Tree Topology Has Little Effect on the Decision-Theoretic Approach to Model Selection in Phylogeny Estimation
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 691 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
U. Gophna, W. F. Doolittle, and R. L. Charlebois
Weighted Genome Trees: Refinements and Applications
J. Bacteriol., February 15, 2005; 187(4): 1305 - 1316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
F. Amarita, M. Yvon, M. Nardi, E. Chambellon, J. Delettre, and P. Bonnarme
Identification and Functional Analysis of the Gene Encoding Methionine-{gamma}-Lyase in Brevibacterium linens
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., December 1, 2004; 70(12): 7348 - 7354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
E. Susko, Y. Inagaki, and A. J. Roger
On Inconsistency of the Neighbor-Joining, Least Squares, and Minimum Evolution Estimation When Substitution Processes Are Incorrectly Modeled
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2004; 21(9): 1629 - 1642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
H. Philippe, E. A. Snell, E. Bapteste, P. Lopez, P. W. H. Holland, and D. Casane
Phylogenomics of Eukaryotes: Impact of Missing Data on Large Alignments
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2004; 21(9): 1740 - 1752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
R. Desper and O. Gascuel
Theoretical Foundation of the Balanced Minimum Evolution Method of Phylogenetic Inference and Its Relationship to Weighted Least-Squares Tree Fitting
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2004; 21(3): 587 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. Cobbe and M. M. S. Heck
The Evolution of SMC Proteins: Phylogenetic Analysis and Structural Implications
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2004; 21(2): 332 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of PaleontologyHome page
SIMULATIONS OF EVOLUTIONARY RADIATIONS AND THEIR APPLICATION TO UNDERSTANDING THE PROBABILITY OF A CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION
Journal of Paleontology, January 1, 2004; 78(1): 31 - 38.



Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Tokoro, T. Asai, S. Kobayashi, T. Takeuchi, and T. Nozaki
Identification and Characterization of Two Isoenzymes of Methionine {gamma}-Lyase from Entamoeba histolytica: A KEY ENZYME OF SULFUR-AMINO ACID DEGRADATION IN AN ANAEROBIC PARASITIC PROTIST THAT LACKS FORWARD AND REVERSE TRANS-SULFURATION PATHWAYS
J. Biol. Chem., October 24, 2003; 278(43): 42717 - 42727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. L. Taylor, T. D. Bruns, T. M. Szaro, and S. A. Hodges
Divergence in mycorrhizal specialization within Hexalectris spicata (Orchidaceae), a nonphotosynthetic desert orchid
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2003; 90(8): 1168 - 1179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
E. Susko
Confidence Regions and Hypothesis Tests for Topologies Using Generalized Least Squares
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2003; 20(6): 862 - 868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
N. Goldman and S. Whelan
A Novel Use of Equilibrium Frequencies in Models of Sequence Evolution
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2002; 19(11): 1821 - 1831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
V. Ranwez and O. Gascuel
Improvement of Distance-Based Phylogenetic Methods by a Local Maximum Likelihood Approach Using Triplets
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2002; 19(11): 1952 - 1963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
S. A. Kelchner
Group II introns as phylogenetic tools: structure, function, and evolutionary constraints
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2002; 89(10): 1651 - 1669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. Poupard, J. Brown, R. Gagnon, M. J. Stanhope, and C. Stewart
Methods for Data Mining from Large Multinational Surveillance Studies
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., August 1, 2002; 46(8): 2409 - 2419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of PaleontologyHome page
TESTING PHYLOGENETIC HYPOTHESES WITH STRATIGRAPHY AND MORPHOLOGY--A COMMENT ON SMITH (2000)
Journal of Paleontology, July 1, 2002; 76(4): 590 - 593.



Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Guindon and O. Gascuel
Efficient Biased Estimation of Evolutionary Distances When Substitution Rates Vary Across Sites
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2002; 19(4): 534 - 543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
R. Nyffeler
Phylogenetic relationships in the cactus family (Cactaceae) based on evidence from trnK/ matK and trnL-trnF sequences
Am. J. Botany, February 1, 2002; 89(2): 312 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
R. Breitling, D. Laubner, and J. Adamski
Structure-based Phylogenetic Analysis of Short-chain Alcohol Dehydrogenases and Reclassification of the 17beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Family
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2001; 18(12): 2154 - 2161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Ota and W.-H. Li
NJML+: An Extension of the NJML Method to Handle Protein Sequence Data and Computer Software Implementation
Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2001; 18(11): 1983 - 1992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. S. Rosenberg and S. Kumar
Traditional Phylogenetic Reconstruction Methods Reconstruct Shallow and Deep Evolutionary Relationships Equally Well
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2001; 18(9): 1823 - 1827.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
X. Xia and Z. Xie
DAMBE: Software Package for Data Analysis in Molecular Biology and Evolution
J. Hered., July 1, 2001; 92(4): 371 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
G. C. Conant and P. O. Lewis
Effects of Nucleotide Composition Bias on the Success of the Parsimony Criterion in Phylogenetic Inference
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2001; 18(6): 1024 - 1033.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. D. Bell and R. W. Patterson
Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of Linanthus (Polemoniaceae)
Am. J. Botany, December 1, 2000; 87(12): 1857 - 1870.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. J. Barkman, G. Chenery, J. R. McNeal, J. Lyons-Weiler, W. J. Ellisens, G. Moore, A. D. Wolfe, and C. W. dePamphilis
Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny
PNAS, November 2, 2000; (2000) 220427497.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Ota and W.-H. Li
NJML: A Hybrid Algorithm for the Neighbor-Joining and Maximum-Likelihood Methods
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2000; 17(9): 1401 - 1409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
K. Takahashi and M. Nei
Efficiencies of Fast Algorithms of Phylogenetic Inference Under the Criteria of Maximum Parsimony, Minimum Evolution, and Maximum Likelihood When a Large Number of Sequences Are Used
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2000; 17(8): 1251 - 1258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
B. Korber, M. Muldoon, J. Theiler, F. Gao, R. Gupta, A. Lapedes, B. H. Hahn, S. Wolinsky, and T. Bhattacharya
Timing the Ancestor of the HIV-1 Pandemic Strains
Science, June 9, 2000; 288(5472): 1789 - 1796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
R. M. Ewing, A. B. Kahla, O. Poirot, F. Lopez, S. Audic, and J.-M. Claverie
Large-Scale Statistical Analyses of Rice ESTs Reveal Correlated Patterns of Gene Expression
Genome Res., October 1, 1999; 9(10): 950 - 959.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
J. P. Slattery, G. Franchini, and A. Gessain
Genomic Evolution, Patterns of Global Dissemination, and Interspecies Transmission of Human and Simian T-cell Leukemia/Lymphotropic Viruses
Genome Res., June 1, 1999; 9(6): 525 - 540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. Santamaria, G. Velasco, A. M. Pendas, A. Paz, and C. Lopez-Otin
Molecular Cloning and Structural and Functional Characterization of Human Cathepsin F, a New Cysteine Proteinase of the Papain Family with a Long Propeptide Domain
J. Biol. Chem., May 14, 1999; 274(20): 13800 - 13809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
P. Liò and N. Goldman
Models of Molecular Evolution and Phylogeny
Genome Res., December 1, 1998; 8(12): 1233 - 1244.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Nei, S. Kumar, and K. Takahashi
The optimization principle in phylogenetic analysis tends to give incorrect topologies when the number of nucleotides or amino acids used is small
PNAS, October 13, 1998; 95(21): 12390 - 12397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
J. P. Huelsenbeck and B. Rannala
Phylogenetic Methods Come of Age: Testing Hypotheses in an Evolutionary Context
Science, April 11, 1997; 276(5310): 227 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. J. Barkman, G. Chenery, J. R. McNeal, J. Lyons-Weiler, W. J. Ellisens, G. Moore, A. D. Wolfe, and C. W. dePamphilis
From the Cover: Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny
PNAS, November 21, 2000; 97(24): 13166 - 13171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.